World

Essex father fined over son's fatal fall at Cyprus hotel

Joshua Foster was fined €3,000 after his two-year-old son fell from a hotel window that he believed was closed on the family's first day in Cyprus.

Robert Aldridge, Senior Reporter at The Daily Times

By Robert Aldridge, Senior Reporter
Published 16 Oct 2026, 13:00

Entrance to Paphos District Court in Cyprus with several people seen from behind.
Entrance to Paphos District Court in Cyprus with several people seen from behind.

What happened

An Essex father has been ordered to pay €3,000 (£2,500) after admitting an offence over the death of his two-year-old son during a holiday in Cyprus. Joshua Foster, 37, was sentenced at Paphos District Court on Friday morning following the child's fall from a fourth-floor hotel window.

The boy died on 12 July, hours after the family arrived for their holiday. Foster had lifted him on to a windowsill so he could see a waterpark outside the King Evelthon Beach Hotel and Resort in Chlorakas. He believed glass separated his son from the drop, but part of the window was open.

The child fell about 12 metres, or 40ft. Foster's account to police was that the fall happened too quickly for him to catch the boy. He gave that account voluntarily, describing how his son fell after being placed on the sill.

Prosecutor Chryso Pergandi told the court that police received a call about the fall at approximately 18:40. The child was taken to Paphos General Hospital, where attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful and he was pronounced dead.

Foster pleaded guilty to causing death by an act that was reckless, rash or dangerous. District Judge Froso Christodoulidou imposed the fine at a hearing lasting about 25 minutes, during which he struggled to contain his tears as she delivered the sentence.

The judge characterised his action as a brief error with fatal consequences. In explaining the sentence, she also recognised that any punishment imposed by the court would be overshadowed by what Foster would experience personally through the death of his son.

The background

Foster, who works as an auditor, travelled to Cyprus with his wife, their two children and his parents-in-law. They arrived in the early hours of 12 July and spent part of their first day taking part in activities, including swimming, at the five-star beachfront resort.

That evening, the family returned to their rooms to prepare for dinner. At about 18:00, Foster walked towards a lift with his son and father-in-law. His lawyer, Alexandros Alexandrou, described him as cheerful and playing with the child as they made their way through the hotel.

The boy spotted the waterpark as they approached the lift. The sequence described to the court was that Foster pressed the lift button and then put his son on the windowsill to look outside. The fall followed before he could respond to what was happening.

Details of those final moments were examined at an earlier hearing on 6 October. Alexandrou explained that Foster had assumed there was a pane of protective glass in front of the boy, rather than recognising that the section through which he was looking was open.

The window measured 2.85 metres across and 1.2 metres high. Christodoulidou considered its appearance when assessing Foster's actions, noting that it did not seem to have markings that would necessarily have drawn his attention to the open section.

The judge also addressed the time available to him. She found no evidence that Foster had an adequate opportunity to inspect the window's condition before his son fell. Her assessment therefore considered both what he believed was in front of the child and how rapidly the incident developed.

After the fall, Foster was taken to Paphos General Hospital, where a blood sample was collected for drug and alcohol testing. Alcohol was detected, but it was not a major element of the prosecution case. Alexandrou told the court that no witness had testified that Foster was drunk.

What people are saying

Alexandrou argued that criminal proceedings should not have been brought against his client. His criticism focused on the effect of the case on a bereaved father, saying that the three months following the death had deprived Foster of the opportunity to mourn as he wished alongside his family.

The lawyer told the court that Foster spent eight days in custody immediately after the incident. During that period, he had to telephone his daughter to explain what had happened to her brother, dealing with that conversation while himself grieving and being held by police.

In mitigation, Alexandrou pointed to Foster's lack of previous convictions and described his remorse as evident. He presented the death as an event that had permanently altered his client's life, rather than an incident whose consequences could be measured solely by the criminal penalty.

Outside court, the lawyer emphasised Foster's relationship with his family. He described him as a devoted father and said his relatives had continued to support him throughout the proceedings. His account stressed the family's closeness at a time when the death and the court case had placed them under considerable strain.

Speaking through a translator, Alexandrou said the stress of the proceedings had affected Foster's ability to confront his loss. He expected the emotional impact to become more immediate once the legal case had ended, framing the conclusion of sentencing as the beginning of a different period of grief.

Foster's own remarks after the hearing centred on returning to his family. He thanked those who had supported him and said he wanted to go home to his wife and daughter. Before speaking outside, he hugged his lawyer and then embraced his parents following the court's decision.

What happens next

The sentence was a financial penalty rather than a prison term. The €3,000 fine followed Foster's admission of the offence, bringing the proceedings described by his lawyer to an end. The eight days he had already spent in custody came immediately after the fall, before Friday's sentencing hearing.

For Foster, the next step he identified was going home. His wife and daughter were the focus of that stated intention, while his parents were with him at court for the outcome. His comments concerned being reunited with his household rather than setting out any further legal action.

Alexandrou's assessment of the period ahead was that Foster would now begin to experience emotions that the pressure of the case had held back. That was the lawyer's expectation about his client's grief, separate from the judge's decision on the appropriate punishment for the offence he had admitted.

Why this matters

For UK families travelling overseas, the case illustrates how a fatal incident on holiday can lead to criminal proceedings in the country where it happens. Foster's conduct at a Cyprus hotel was examined by a court in Paphos, with his mistaken belief about the window central to its consideration.

The consequences also extended beyond the father who faced prosecution. His daughter learned of her brother's death in a telephone call from custody, and relatives supported him through the case. Friday's sentence resolved the criminal proceedings, while leaving the family to live with the child's death.

Reporting that informed this story

This article was written independently by The Daily Times from publicly available facts and headlines. No text has been copied from the outlets above.